|
|
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
«HUMAN GEOGRAPHY JOURNAL» |
|
REVIEW
|
Title of the article |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Does the content of the article correspond to the subject matter of the publication? |
Yes |
Partly |
No |
|
|
2 |
Does the title match the article's contents? |
Yes |
Partly |
No |
|
|
3 |
Does Important and relevant issues are highlighted in this article? |
Important |
Standard |
Unimportant and uninteresting |
|
|
4 |
Does the structure of the article consistent with the requirements for materials published in professional and international publications? |
Yes |
Partly |
No |
|
|
5 |
Does enough scientific analysis of literature and other sources on the subject of research? |
The scientific literature has been analyzed in detail |
The analysis of scientific literature is superficial |
The analysis of scientific literature on the subject of research is absent |
|
|
6 |
Does the presentation of the article material logical, consistent and understandable? |
Yes, logical and consistent is outlined |
Logical and consistent is outlined, but there are unclear places |
Difficult to read, ther are many difficult to understand literary designs |
|
|
7 |
Does the article contain elements of scientific`s novelty? |
Yes |
Partly |
No |
|
|
8 |
Does the research methods used adequate and sufficient for this topic? |
Yes |
Partly |
No |
|
|
9 |
Are the results of the research reliable and well-founded? |
Yes |
Partly |
No |
|
|
10 |
Are the conclusions in the article correct and logically grounded? |
Yes |
Partly |
No |
|
|
11 |
Is there a need to change the scope of the article? |
Enlarge |
No |
Decrease |
|
|
12 |
Does the abstract and abstract disclose the contents of the main research results? |
Yes |
Partly |
No |
|
|
13 |
Are the keywords of the article content relevant? |
Yes |
Partly |
No |
|
|
14 |
Are the illustrations (tables, figures, photos, etc.) in the article relevant? |
To expand |
Permissible |
To reduce / correct |
|
|
15 |
Is the list of sources used sufficient, relevant and relevant? |
To expand |
Permissible |
To reduce |
|
|
16 |
Does the list of used sources meet the requirements? |
Corresponds completely |
Corresponds partly |
Completely does not correspond |
|
|
17 |
Does the overall design of the article meet the requirements? |
Yes |
Partly |
No |
|
|
18 |
Style and literacy of the language of the article: |
High |
Average |
Low |
|
|
19 |
Conclusion on the suitability of the article before posting |
a) Applicable in the present form |
|||
|
b) Applicable with minor changes |
|||||
|
c) Applicable after refinement |
|||||
|
d) Unsuitable (highlight the option) – does not match the subject matter of the publication - inadequate research methodology - insufficient theoretical / empirical justification of the results - other (specify) |
|||||
|
20 |
Does the article require in the case of variants b) and c) new review after refinement? |
Yes |
No |
||
Additional comment, including possible recommendations to the author regarding the revision of the article
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
(academic degree, academic rank,
position, place of work) (signature) (name)
«____» ________________ _________